Puedes empezar a leer Bad Science en tu Kindle en menos de un minuto. ¿No tienes un Kindle? Consigue un Kindle aquí.

Enviar a mi Kindle o a otro dispositivo

 
 
 

Pruébalo gratis

Lee el principio de este eBook gratis

Enviar a mi Kindle o a otro dispositivo

Lee libros en tu ordenador o en otros dispositivos móviles gracias a nuestras Aplicaciones de lectura Kindle GRATUITAS.
Bad Science
 
Ampliar la imagen
 

Bad Science [Versión Kindle]

Ben Goldacre

Precio lista ed. digital: EUR 8,82 ¿Qué es esto?
Precio lista ed. impresa: EUR 10,98
Precio Kindle: EUR 6,17 IVA incluido (si corresponde) y envío a través de Amazon Whispernet
Ahorras: EUR 4,81 (44%)

Formatos

Precio Amazon Nuevo de Usado de
Versión Kindle EUR 6,17  
Tapa blanda EUR 9,00  
Audio, CD, Audiolibro, Versión íntegra EUR 28,91  
Descubre cómo ahorrar hasta un 90% en un título diferente cada día
Inscríbete en la Newsletter Kindle Flash y recibe directamente en tu bandeja de entrada la oferta del día Kindle Flash para no perderte ni un título en promoción. Más información

Los clientes que compraron este producto también compraron


Descripción del producto

Descripción del producto

Ben Goldacre’s wise and witty bestseller, shortlisted for the Samuel Johnson Prize, lifts the lid on quack doctors, flaky statistics, scaremongering journalists and evil pharmaceutical corporations.

Since 2003 Dr Ben Goldacre has been exposing dodgy medical data in his popular Guardian column. In this eye-opening book he takes on the MMR hoax and misleading cosmetics ads, acupuncture and homeopathy, vitamins and mankind’s vexed relationship with all manner of ‘toxins’. Along the way, the self-confessed ‘Johnny Ball cum Witchfinder General’ performs a successful detox on a Barbie doll, sees his dead cat become a certified nutritionist and probes the supposed medical qualifications of ‘Dr’ Gillian McKeith.

Full spleen and satire, Ben Goldacre takes us on a hilarious, invigorating and ultimately alarming journey through the bad science we are fed daily by hacks and quacks.


Detalles del producto

  • Formato: Versión Kindle
  • Tamaño del archivo: 1019 KB
  • Longitud de impresión: 387
  • Números de página - ISBN de origen: 000728487X
  • Editor: Fourth Estate (7 de diciembre de 2008)
  • Vendido por: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Idioma: Inglés
  • ASIN: B002RI9ORI
  • Texto a voz: No activado
  • X-Ray: No activado
  • Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon: n°7.340 Pagados in Tienda Kindle (Ver el Top 100 de pago en Tienda Kindle)

¿Qué otros productos compran los clientes tras ver este producto?


Opiniones de clientes

Todavía no hay opiniones de clientes en Amazon.es
5 estrellas
4 estrellas
3 estrellas
2 estrellas
1 estrellas
Opiniones de clientes más útiles en Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.4 de un máximo de 5 estrellas  54 opiniones
35 de 35 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas READ THIS BOOK 16 de octubre de 2008
Por P. Haggerty - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa blanda
I had to have someone traveling to London bring it back for me, and very worth it!! If you want a painless (and funny) intro into understanding science news, this is the place to get it.

Dr. Goldacre may be writing in Britain, but everything he says is relevant to the way science and medicine is reported in this country. What are drug companies hiding? What is behind the good for you/bad for you news on health? What about alternative medicine and vitamins? How can I judge evidence for myself? You can learn quite a bit from this slender volume.

Find a way to get it!
30 de 32 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Brilliant account of bad medicine 16 de diciembre de 2008
Por William Podmore - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa blanda
Ben Goldacre is a doctor who writes a weekly column in the Guardian exposing bad medicine. He writes, "The hole in our culture is gaping: evidence-based medicine, the ultimate applied science, contains some of the cleverest ideas from the past two centuries, it has saved millions of lives, but there has never once been a single exhibit on the subject in London's Science Museum."

He attacks the idea that social and political problems can be solved by pills, even Patrick Holford's Optimal Nutrition pills, or those of the TV 'nutritionist' Gillian McKeith, with her PhD from a non-accredited correspondence course 'college' in the USA. Their advice is just 'a manifesto of right-wing individualism', blaming people's ill-health on their food choices, not on the social inequality that drives health inequality.

Dr Goldacre writes, "All too often this spurious privatisation of common sense is happening in areas where we could be taking control, doing it ourselves, feeling our own potency and our ability to make sensible decisions; instead we are fostering our dependence on expensive outside systems and people."

He praises the brilliant Cochrane reviews of medical literature. He notes that to say that giving placebos in trials of treatments is unethical is to assume that the treatment is better, which is to assume what is being tested. We don't know the result of the trial before we do it - that is why we do trials.

For example, trials have proven that the painkiller Vioxx caused 80,000-139,000 heart attacks, a third probably fatal, during its five years on the market. Trials have also discredited antioxidants, hormone replacement therapy and calcium supplements.

Dr Goldacre notes that anti-arrhythmia drugs when given to all heart attack patients, not just to those with arrhythmic heartbeats, increased their risk of dying. He reminds us that Benjamin Spock's well-meant but wrong advice - that babies should sleep on their tummies - led to tens of thousands of cot deaths. What counts is the effect, not the intent.

He recounts the media's disgraceful nine-year campaign against the Measles Mumps Rubella vaccine. The campaign caused an epidemic of mumps in Britain, with 5,000 cases in January 2005, and 2008 saw the highest number of measles cases since 1995. Nearly half of all homoeopaths irresponsibly advised against taking the vaccine, as did almost a fifth of chiropractors. Only a few homeopaths and just a quarter of the chiropractors acted professionally and recommended it.
17 de 17 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas quackery unmasked 11 de marzo de 2009
Por W. P. Gibbons - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa blanda
Maybe you are unfamiliar with Ben, maybe because he is a Brit, maybe because you don't read the Guardian newspaper (for shame), or maybe because you skip Ben's piece because he plays rough? Well for years I've been turning to his column first. Now there is a great book.

Ben's Bad Science is a brilliant, well-argued polemic against charlatanism of all kind.

I was first drawn to him as he exposed my favorite pet peeve - homeopathy. Then he trained his sights on the food supplements industry and its 'anti-oxidant' and 'super-food' shenanigans.

But Bad Science doesn't just take aim at alternative quackery.

Ben takes aim at Big Pharma for its shady research practices, and shameful marketing practice. (Thank Jesus he doesn't live in the US with its prime-time onslaught of drug advertising - I don't think his blood pressure could take it.) He takes aim at Big Media - for misrepresenting and misusing science and for irresponsible reporting (MMR and MRSA).

Well done Ben. If in your lifetime you can, chipping away, restore some sanity to the public understanding of science - you will make us all better off.

Check out his site: [...]

Paul Gibbons
Ir a Amazon.com para ver las 54 opiniones existentes 4.4 de un máximo de 5 estrellas

Subrayados populares

 (¿Qué es esto?)
&quote;
As Voltaire said: The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease. &quote;
Subrayado por 68 usuarios de Kindle
&quote;
You cannot reason people out of positions they didnt reason themselves into. &quote;
Subrayado por 59 usuarios de Kindle
&quote;
Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing Ones Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments, by Justin Kruger and David Dunning. They noted that people who are incompetent suffer a dual burden: not only are they incompetent, but they may also be too incompetent to assay their own incompetence, because the skills which underlie an ability to make a correct judgement are the same as the skills required to recognise a correct judgement. &quote;
Subrayado por 52 usuarios de Kindle

Foros de debate

El foro de este producto
Debate Respuestas Última entrada
Aún no hay debates

Haz preguntas, comparte opiniones, ponte al día
Iniciar un nuevo debate
Tema:
Primera entrada:
Solicita el inicio de sesión
 

   



Buscar productos similares por categoría