Puedes empezar a leer Poor Economics en tu Kindle en menos de un minuto. ¿No tienes un Kindle? Consigue un Kindle aquí o empieza a leer ahora con una de nuestras aplicaciones de lectura Kindle gratuitas.

Enviar a mi Kindle o a otro dispositivo


Pruébalo gratis

Lee el principio de este eBook gratis

Enviar a mi Kindle o a otro dispositivo

Lo sentimos, este producto no está disponible en
Imagen no disponible del

Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty [Versión Kindle]

Abhijit Banerjee , Esther Duflo
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas  Ver todas las opiniones (1 opinión de cliente)

Precio lista ed. digital: EUR 14,51 ¿Qué es esto?
Precio lista ed. impresa: EUR 14,27
Precio Kindle: EUR 8,99 IVA incluido (si corresponde) y envío a través de Amazon Whispernet
Ahorras: EUR 5,28 (37%)

Aplicación de lectura Kindle gratuita Todo el mundo puede leer libros Kindle, incluso sin un dispositivo Kindle, con la app de Kindle GRATIS para smartphones, tablets y ordenadores.

Para conseguir la app gratuita, introduce tu dirección de correo electrónico o tu número de móvil.


Precio Amazon Nuevo desde Usado desde
Versión Kindle EUR 8,99  
Tapa dura --  
Tapa blanda EUR 12,86  
Audio, CD, Audiolibro EUR 36,89  
Kindle Unlimited
Descubre más de 700.000 eBooks en cualquier dispositivo Kindle o en la aplicación gratuita Kindle. Pruébalo gratis durante 30 días

Descripción del producto


Amartya Sen "A marvellously insightful book by two outstanding researchers on the real nature of poverty." Steven D. Levitt "This book is a must-read for anyone who cares about world poverty. It has been years since I read a book that taught me so much. 'Poor Economics' represents the best that economics has to offer." Robert Solow "Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo are allergic to grand generalizations about the secret of economic development. Instead they appeal to many local observations and experiments to explore how poor people in poor countries actually cope with their poverty: what they know, what they seem (or don't seem) to want, what they expect of themselves and others, and how they make the choices that they can make. Apparently there are plenty of small but meaningful victories to be won, some through private and some through public action, that together could add up to a large gains for the world's poor, and might even start a ball rolling. I was fascinated and convinced." The Guardian, April 11, 2011 "[Banerjee and Duflo] offer a refreshingly original take on development, and they are very aware of how they are bringing an entirely new perspective into a subject dominated by big polemics from the likes of Jeffrey Sachs and William Easterly... they are clearly very clever economists and are doing a grand job to enrich their discipline's grasp of complex issues of poverty -- so often misunderstood by people who have never been poor." The Economist, April 22, 2011 "In an engrossing new book they draw on some intrepid research and a store of personal anecdotes to illuminate the lives of the 865m people who, at the last count, live on less than $0.99 a day." The Economist's Free Exchange Blog, April 21, 2011 "Let me recommend it... Poor Economics is more than just a compendium of the randomistas' greatest hits. For one thing, it contains some well-observed reporting." The Economist's Free Exchange, April 21, 2011 "To cut to the chase: this is the best book about the lives of the poor that I have read for a very, very long time. The research is wide-ranging. Much of it is new. Above all, Banerjee and Duflo take the poorest billion people as they find them. There is no wishful thinking. The attitude is straightforward and honest, occasionally painfully so. And some of the conclusions are surprising, even disconcerting." The New York Times, May 19, 2011 "Randomized trials are the hottest thing in the fight against poverty, and two excellent new books have just come out by leaders in the field. One is "Poor Economics," by Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo... These terrific books move the debate to the crucial question: What kind of aid works best?" Forbes.com, April 25, 2011 "a compelling and important read... an honest and readable account about the poor that stands a chance of actually yielding results." Philanthropy Action, April 25, 2011 "Banerjee and Duflo write exceptionally well, and given that there are two of them, the voice is surprisingly singular. But the real surprise in this book is its humility. Both the authors and the material they pull from are truly formidable, yet Banerjee and Duflo are not really out to make a hard pitch, least of all to die-hard Big Idealists who disagree with them. As such, there is nothing directly confrontational about Poor Economics. They are peeling the onion, not hacking it to pieces." The Guardian, May 18, 2011 "Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo's book, Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty, is making waves in development circles. Beyond the strong focus on randomised control trials, the book distinguishes itself by wading into issues on which the development community has often ignored or made uninformed guesses. These include the rationale behind the decisions made by the poor, whether they make the "best" decisions available, and how policymakers should respond." Matthew Yglesias, May 7, 2011 "Esther Duflo won the John Bates Clark medal last year for her work on development economics, so I was excited to read her new book with Abhijit Banerjee Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. It's a good book. It doesn't really contain a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty, but it does try to cut past lame debates over whether or not foreign aid "works" to instead attempt to find ways to actually assess which programs are working, which aren't, and how to improve those that don't." The Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2011 "Marvelous, rewarding...'More Than Good Intentions' and 'Poor Economics' are marked by their deep appreciation of the precariousness that colors the lives of poor people as they tiptoe along the margin of survival. But I would give an edge to Mr. Banerjee and Ms. Duflo in this area--the sheer detail and warm sympathy on display reflects a true appreciation of the challenges their subjects face... They have fought to establish a beachhead of honesty and rigor about evidence, evaluation and complexity in an aid world that would prefer to stick to glossy brochures and celebrity photo-ops. For this they deserve to be congratulated--and to be read." Financial Times, April 30, 2011 "The ingenuity of these experiments aside, it is the rich and humane portrayal of the lives of the very poor that most impresses. Both books show how those in poverty make sophisticated calculations in the grimmest of circumstances... Books such as these offer a better path forward. They are surely an experiment worth pursuing." Cleveland Plain Dealer, May 2, 2011 "Here's something Jesus might recommend: Reading the clear, calm and revelatory book "Poor Economics," from Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo. It is gloriously instructive, and bracing testimony in itself to the gold standard of the Enlightenment: the scientific method. The authors, both economists at MIT, spent 15 years in the field, running randomized controlled trials to test various approaches to combating poverty. They bring both rigor and humility to a predicament typically riven by ideology and blowhards." Financial World (UK),June 2011 "A remarkable work: incisive, scientific, compelling and very accessible, a must-read for advocates and opponents of international aid alike, for interested laymen and dedicated academics... Amartya Sen, fellow Nobel Prize winner Robert Solow and superstar economics author Steven Levitt wholeheartedly endorse this book. I urge you to read it. It will help shape the debate in development economics." Fast Company, June 15, 2011 "Fascinating and captivating. Their work reads like a version of Freakonomics for the poor. There are insights into fighting global poverty from the remarkable and vital perspective of those whom we profess to serve...They remind us, I think, of our shared humanity and how at some fundamental levels we really do think alike." IndianExpress.com, June 18, 2011 "This is a welcome shift in methodology as it implicitly concedes the need to combine social science with hard economics." Outlook India, June 25, 2011 "It vividly, sensitively and rigorously brings alive the dilemmas of the poor as economic agents in a variety of contexts, whether as consumers or risk-takers. There are splendid chapters on a variety of topics that affect the poor: food, health, education, savings, micro-credit, insurance, risk and even some cursory observations on political behaviour." Reilly Media, "Radar" blog, June 27, 2011 "This is possibly the best thing I will read all year, an insightful (and research-backed) book digging into the economics of poverty... Love that the website is so very complementary to the book, and 100% aligned with the ambition to convince and spread the word." Publishers Weekly (online), May 2011 "Their empirical approach differs from policy discussions that base support or criticism of aid programs on a broad overview; instead they illuminate many practicable and cost-effective ways to keep children and parents living healthier and more productive lives. An important perspective on fighting poverty." The Guardian, June 6, 2011 "Duflo and Banerjee tell these stories (of their randomised control trials) in a lovely new book called Poor Economics. As they admit, randomistas cannot answer some big questions -- how to tackle food prices, for instance. But through lots of microstudies, they make a subtle case for one big argument: aid really can help poor people, provided the money follows the evidence." Vancouver Sun, June 11, 2011 "This new book by Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo eschews the ideology of both the right and the left, and focuses on what measurable evidence has to say about the often-conflicting myths that dominate discussion of international development. The book is unusual, perhaps unique, in that the authors took a lot of time to talk to poor people about what they think and what they want." Seth Godin (blog),June 15, 2011 "Fact-based, actionable and totally unforgettable insights on the fight to help the poor help themselves." Financial Express, July, 2011 "[Banerjee and Duflo] draw upon the latest literature in the domain, write simply and succinctly on complex issues, display a level of honesty and humility rare among economists, and take the help of many highly illustrative examples to help us understand poverty from many different angles. The overall message is unambiguous. This is a complex problem, the causes and symptoms of which vary highly between individual cases. The solutions? Well, they are rightly silent on that -- at best there is a murmur or two. Poverty is not a single problem so the solutions are too case-specific for a single solution... This should be standard reading and essential material in all aid organisations and more so in the National Advisory Council, Planning Commission, Prime Minister's Office, and the various ministries -- all those who don't spend time understanding poverty in close vicinity." Development Policy (blog) "The persuasiveness of 'Poor Economics' lies in its authors' intellectual approach...Moreover, it is well organised throughout and nicely written... 'Poor Economics' is well worth reading in full." Business World (India) 7/30 "Banerjee and Duflo...

Descripción del producto

Why do the poor borrow to save? Why do they miss out on free life-saving immunizations, but pay for unnecessary drugs? In Poor Economics, Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo, two practical visionaries working toward ending world poverty, answer these questions from the ground. In a book the Wall Street Journal called “marvelous, rewarding,” the authors tell how the stress of living on less than 99 cents per day encourages the poor to make questionable decisions that feed—not fight—poverty. The result is a radical rethinking of the economics of poverty that offers a ringside view of the lives of the world’s poorest, and shows that creating a world without poverty begins with understanding the daily decisions facing the poor.

Detalles del producto

  • Formato: Versión Kindle
  • Tamaño del archivo: 685 KB
  • Longitud de impresión: 321
  • Números de página - ISBN de origen: 1586487981
  • Editor: PublicAffairs; Edición: Reprint (27 de marzo de 2012)
  • Vendido por: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Idioma: Inglés
  • ASIN: B007CI81IQ
  • Texto a voz: Activado
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Activado
  • Valoración media de los clientes: 5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas  Ver todas las opiniones (1 opinión de cliente)
  • Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon: n°48.492 Pagados en Tienda Kindle (Ver el Top 100 de pago en Tienda Kindle)

Opiniones de clientes

4 estrellas
3 estrellas
2 estrellas
1 estrellas
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas
Las opiniones de cliente más útiles
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Muy buen libro 6 de marzo de 2014
Formato:Tapa blanda|Compra verificada
EL libro cumple mis expectativas, la edición es muy buena y el precio muy económico. Es justo lo que quería
¿Esta opinión te ha parecido útil?
Opiniones de clientes más útiles en Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.4 de un máximo de 5 estrellas  164 opiniones
105 de 108 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Refreshing and Powerful Vision of Anti-Poverty Policy 13 de julio de 2011
Por Herbert Gintis - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa dura|Compra verificada
The authors identify three major approaches to dealing with world poverty, suggest that whatever their virtues and faults, there is a very piecemeal and pragmatic approach through which significant gains can be made without addressing the systemic obstacles identified by the three approaches. Their analysis is brilliant, focused, rooted in first-rate data sets, yet rich in social detail and anecdotal vignettes. I believe there are probably right, and their approach deserves to be widely studied an evaluated by policy makers in the advanced and developing countries.

The dominant school of thought is probably the supply-side theory, most visibly represented by Jeffrey Sachs (the authors call him a "supply wallah"). According to this theory, the poor are poor because they lack money and resources, and there is a "poverty trap" such that investment in productive technologies must be very large in order to have a positive and sustainable effect. Because poor individuals, and even poor countries, lack the capacity to finance such investments, they are trapped in a low-level economic equilibrium. For this reason, Sachs and the supply theorists advise that the rich countries transfer a large lump-sum amount of money to a poor country, so it can get over the poverty-trap hump.

A second salient school of thought is the demand-side theory, represented by William Easterly and many others. Demand-siders (the authors call them "demand wallahs") believes that the poor are poor because they do not want to undertake what would be necessary to move out of poverty and there is no poverty trap. Thus, if you throw money and resources to the poor, they consume it immediately rather than using it for long-term betterment.

The third school of thought is the corruption school, represented by Acemoglu and Robinson, as expounded in the book Why Nations Fail. According to this theory, countries remain poor because their governments are predatory, exploiting the citizenry by refusing to make investments in productive infrastructure, by direction all profits to cronies, and by permitting rampant corruption that renders creative entrepreneurship unprofitable. According to this school, to which I admit to being very favorable, the supply wallahs are wrong because the resources throw into the system will be appropriate by the rich and powerful, and the demand wallahs are wrong because the poor are actively maintained by the oligarchy in their position of servitude.

The authors are very insightful and balanced in presenting the views of these three schools and the evidence that supports these various positions. They also clearly explain their mutual critiques. For instance, the supply wallahs claim that states are predatory and corruption is rampant only because the country is so poor, and the demand wallahs claim that when the people want to move out of poverty, they will reform their governments. I find these defenses of supply and demand wallahs rather tendentious, leaving the corruptions school as the overall most plausible school.

I think it is fair to say that Banerjee and Duflo have little sympathy for demand and supply wallahs, but considerable respect for the corruption theory. Their own position is that there are virtually always ways to productively intervene to pull a significant fraction of people out of poverty. The authors, who have collected huge amounts of data and interviewed many poor people from around the world, make the following argument.

Most important, the poor in a poor country have about the same array of preferences and capacities as that of the human population as a whole, and humans are substantively rational in making decisions that affect their lives. However, the poor have a lot fewer resources than the well-off, they lack information and skills provided to the well-off, and lack access to such public goods as clean water and consumables subject to food and drug regulations.

The poor are therefore extremely heterogeneous. Microfinance organizations like the Grameen Bank therefore provide a general path to affluences, simply because only a fraction of the population has the will and ability to be successful entrepreneurs. On the other hand, entrepreneurs often fail several times before finally becoming successful, so the authors advise an expanded microfinance industry that is more tolerant of the sorts of behaviors that may involve short-term losses, but lead to long-run successes. The authors conclude that we must consider microfinance policies as extremely successful and worthy of following, even though it is not panacea for the abolition of poverty.

Because the poor lack access to social services freely available to the non-poor, the authors advocate such measures as providing clean water to poor villages and adding nutrients, such as iron, to staple foods. This, they argue, is not charity but simply the extension to poor of services already supplied to the rest of society.

Concerning education, the authors believe that poor parents are usually very eager to have their children educated, although they may lack the means of enrolling their children in schools or providing for their transportation to and from school. However, too often the content of schooling is determined by what is good for the more affluent classes, so poor children are led voluntarily to quit school. The authors advise that the content of education take into account the preferences and culture of the target population.

I cannot do justice to the beauty and intricacy of the argument developed in this book. The authors' main point is that we must look closely at the details of the lives of the poor in order to develop policies to help people to pull themselves out of poverty. This is neither demand or supply wallah-ism, and as they repeatedly stress, real progress can be made even in a society whose government provides a poor environment for economic development.
163 de 175 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas A Remarkably Informative Book. 15 de abril de 2011
Por AdamSmythe - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa dura|Compra verificada
Although I am an economist by training and have studied economics for many years, I admit that in reading this book I have learned a great deal about the complexities of both the theory and the practice of anti-poverty policies in developing nations.

Why are people so interested in the issue of global poverty? Well, to list a few of the many aspects about poverty addressed in this book, every year about 9 million children die before they reach their fifth birthday, usually in the poorest countries. In the developed world, a woman has a one-in-5,000 chance of dying while giving birth, but in many sub-Saharan Africa countries the odds are one-in-30. There are at least 25 countries in the world with life expectancies of 55 years or less. If these sorts of situations capture your mind and lead it to ask what can be done, one of the first things you might consider doing is learning more about the conditions and circumstances that lead to these revealing statistics. That's where this book comes in.

So, is this book one you should buy? Presumably that's why you are reading this. Here are a few observations that may help you decide whether to buy this fine book: In the authors' own words, the book "is ultimately about what the lives and choices of the poor tell us about how to fight global poverty." That may not sound too sexy or exciting, but if you have an interest in facts, theories and observations about global poverty, then this is your book. On the other hand, if what you seek are simple theories and, especially, strong advocacy of a few preferred solutions, then you are probably barking up the wrong tree. Don't get me wrong; I like the book just as it is. There is so much information to consider and so many approaches to fighting poverty to contemplate. Just don't expect the authors to take a lot of your time championing pet solutions. Because the problem of poverty is itself rather complex, so are some of its solutions. Jack Webb (the "just the facts, ma'am" star of the "Dragnet" series) might have loved this fact-filled book. At least, he'd love it if he was an economist or someone interested in learning (a lot) about global poverty. Yet there's much more to the book that mere facts. Primarily, there is a pursuit of understanding the circumstances associated with poverty and the efforts to overcome it. That's where this book excels.

It's certainly early to judge, but this book could prove to be a classic in its field. It successfully challenges and encourages the reader to think in new ways about anti-poverty initiatives. Although its authors are probably unknown to the general public, they are well regarded in economics. They both have received a number of prestigious awards, including the John Bates Clark Medal (to Esther Duflo) for the best American economist under age 40. Previous winners of this award include a Who's Who of economists, such as Paul Samuelson, Milton Friedman, James Tobin, Kenneth Arrow, Gary Becker, Martin Feldstein, Lawrence Summers and Steven Levitt.

In short, this is a substantial book with a great deal of important content. There are some graphs, but less than you might expect from two economists. Importantly, it is readable and understandable by the interested lay reader. Frankly, I think it's a book you won't forget. If the issues of global poverty and economic development interest you, this is a book well worth your careful consideration.
17 de 18 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
4.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas radical indeed 26 de mayo de 2011
Por FDR - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa dura|Compra verificada
Development economics is a comparatively new field of study and it has changed considerably in its roughly fifty years of existence. "Poor Economics" represents a significant change, namely a move away from the sweeping generalizations of scholars such as Jeffrey Sachs and William Easterly, and a realization that we actually understand very little in development economics. The proof of our lack of understanding can be found in our lack of success in actually bringing about wealth in the developing world (either that or a hidden lack of intent).
In any case, Banerjee and Duflo start with the premise that, given the inaccuracy of past models, the best we can do is start on a micro level and see what works. They do this through randomized control trials (RCTs), in which groups are subjected to different treatments, such as subsidies for food, education campaigns, or reorganization of village committees. The groups are randomized, with some groups receiving the treatment (experiment group) and others not receiving anything (control group).
Using the results from numerous RCTs around the world, as well as hundreds of other experiments, surveys, case studies and more, "Poor Economics" is incredibly well researched. One thing the authors don't justify, however, is whether RCTs are good predictors of real life choices. For example, how similar are the treatments used in RCTs to the actual policies implemented in real life?
I won't summarize the contents of the book. But I can say that the conclusions within are indeed "radical" in the sense that they take very little for granted. They are based off of micro level data and offer very interesting insight into the incentives that shape the lives of the poor.
The policy recommendations at the end of the book are incontrovertible, but I don't know who realistic they may be in the face of macro-level constraints such as world trade policies that favor developed countries. I have my doubts as to how effective even the best policies and the best governments can have on the development of countries under the economic hegemony of the US and Europe. I wished the authors had addressed this.
26 de 31 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas The tools to make change 27 de abril de 2011
Por Sofya Ignatyeva - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Tapa dura
Poor Economics is an excellent survey of empirical data on the world's most impoverished areas. The amount of work put into the studies (the authors have extensive work in their own control studies) is astounding, and well worth a look for anyone interested in the data.

The general picture one hopes when reading a book like this is a "silver bullet" that will solve the problems of every kind of poor people around the world. As the authors are quite upfront in saying, this is not realistic. Economies are complex and work in strange ways. Anyone familiar with systems dynamics will recognize the traps that "silver bullet" theories get into: one quick fix leads to some improvement, but causes side effects that might make matters worse in the long run.

This book examines how the predominant theories on poverty have played out. They cite Jeffrey Sachs' The End of Poverty, in which the idea is that aid will bring an end to a "poverty trap". And then regard William Easterly's The White Man's Burden, in which the idea is that aid tends to make people dependent on it and thus makes them less capable. With these plausible arguments as a backdrop, they delve into the examples and case studies to identify instances where one or both or neither are true.

Ultimately, the argument that is made is for a comprehensive understanding of the way poverty works in order to apply proper levels and composition of aid. Though, this isn't a grand theoretical survey of the way economies and systems in general function. I would recommend something like Juggernaut: Why the System Crushes the Only People Who Can Save It for that. It is still a penetrating survey of poverty and offers the reader the tools to do something about it.
120 de 156 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
2.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Interesting but flawed 8 de mayo de 2011
Por Tektrader - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato:Versión Kindle|Compra verificada
The authors offer a classification of aid philosophies: _supply wallahs_ and _demand wallahs_. The _supply wallahs_ believe that the poverty is caused by the lack of the goods that are needed to escape poverty. What are these goods? The authors offer the following list: food, health, education, contraception, insurance, banks and entrepreneurship. They devote one chapter to each of these topics. The _demand wallahs_ point to the long string of failed aid projects and claim that what is missing is a demand for these products. For reasons known only to those making the choices. _Demand wallahs_ are skeptical of any top down intervention.

Jeff Sachs is the best known _supply wallahs_. He has argued that small cheap interventions like free mosquito nets can have huge benefits. William Easterly is the best known _demand wallah_. He is a trenchant critic of top down interventions. The book criticizes both of these philosophies. They chide the _supply wallahs_ for not scientifically evaluating potential aid strategies. The author's evaluation tool of choice is the _Randomized Control Trial_ (RCT) (akin to the technique used to evaluate new drugs). They disagree with the _demand wallahs_ by pointing to successful aid strategies (success as measured by RCTs). The authors take the stance: We have no overarching theory of what aid strategy is likely to work. But we will evaluate individual strategies rigorously. And recommend whatever works.

The chapters all follow a pattern: First the authors present a puzzle (e.g. why don't the poor eat more when they earn more?). Then they (half-heartedly) try to explain the behavior by giving us more insight into the lives of the poor. These sections are the best part of each chapter. But the authors say that they are still unable to explain the seemingly irrational behavior. Now, they throw up their hands and appeal to something called _behavioral economics_. Humans are irrational and they need brilliant economists to design aid strategies that take their irrationality into account. And "nudge" them to do the "right" thing. We are told that citizens of rich countries have benevolent "nudgers". But who "nudged" Europe and America from poverty to wealth a few hundred years ago? That question is not tackled by the authors.

While RCTs sound very scientific, no mention is made of the problem of "data mining". i.e. the problem of finding "statistically significant" results simply by trying out a large number of strategies. Spurious results will not work "out of sample". How have the rigorously vetted strategies done when used "out of sample"? We are not told. The comparison to drug testing raises other questions: There are many critics who claim that that the FDA generates more costs than the benefits. RCTs only tell us if a drug works for the average person. But is that the right question? Since there is so much variation amongst people, might not some people benefit from a drug? Similarly for the aid strategy. A more general concern about the book is the astonishing degree of confidence that a "solution" to poverty exists. And that "solution" is amenable to the methods of science. Authors are no doubt familiar with Hayek's criticism of _scientism_. I wonder how they would react to it.

This is an ambitious book. The best parts of the book are the descriptions of the lives of the poor. For example, the description of the mechanics of micro credit is very interesting. But the book fails to tackle more important questions: What are the limitations of RCTs? What is the role of religion and culture? The technocratic and paternalistic tone of book jars. I leave the reader with the following excerpt. This is a rare reference to religion I was able to find in the book: "When the poor actually know what they want -- marrying their daughter to someone from the right caste or religion, to take an *unfortunate* but important example -- they are not at all easy to bribe".
After reading this sentence, I am forced to conclude that all the author's talk of respect for the choices of the poor is mere talk.
Ir a Amazon.com para ver las 164 opiniones existentes 4.4 de un máximo de 5 estrellas

Buscar productos similares por categoría