| Marca | Dell |
|---|---|
| Fabricante | Dell Computers |
| Modelo | S2417DG |
| Nombre del modelo | S2417DG |
| Año del modelo | 2016 |
| Dimensiones del producto | 18 x 54.04 x 49.39 cm; 5.77 kilogramos |
| Número de modelo del producto | S2417DG |
| Número de producto | 210-AJWS |
| Interfaz del hardware | HDMI |
| Tiempo de respuesta | 1 Milisegundos |
| Resolución del escáner | QHD Wide 1440p |
| Componentes incluidos | Monitor |
| Número de productos | 1 |
| Compilador | Dell |
| Tecnología de pantalla | LED |
| Tamaño de la pantalla | 60.47 Pulgadas |
| Tipo de pantalla | 3D |
| Pantalla a color | No |
| Ángulo de visión | 170 Grados |
| Relación de aspecto de imagen | 16:9 |
| Tasa de contraste de imagen | 1000:1 |
| Relación de aspecto | 16:9 |
| Resolución de pantalla | 2560 x 1440 píxeles |
| Resolución máxima | 2560x1440 |
| Resolución horizontal | 2560 Píxeles |
| Resolución vertical máx. | 1440 |
| Potencia eléctrica | 33 vatios |
| Fuente de alimentación | CA. |
| Pilas / baterías incluidas | No |
| Pilas / baterías necesarias | No |
| Adaptador | Dell |
| Frecuencia | 165 Hz |
| Frecuencia de actualización | 165 Hz |
| Número de puertos USB | 5 |
| Tipo de conector | HDMI, DisplayPort, USB 3.0 |
| Lector | Dell |
| Marimba | Dell |
| Compatibilidad del montaje | Montaje en pared |
| Ángulo de visión real | 170 Grados |
| Grabador | Dell |
| Transcriptor | Dell |
| Incluye batería recargable | No |
| Compatible con tecnología Bluetooth | No |
| Peso del producto | 5.77 kg |
DELL S2817Q - Monitor para PC Desktop (2K, Ultra HD, 60,5 cm (23.8"), 2560 x 1440 Pixeles, LED, 1 ms, 350 cd / m², Negro)
| Frecuencia de actualización | 165 Hz |
| Marca | Dell |
| Tamaño de pantalla | 60.47 Pulgadas |
| Total de puertos HDMI | 1 |
| Nombre del modelo | S2417DG |
| Interfaz de hardware | HDMI |
| Tipo de conector | HDMI, DisplayPort, USB 3.0 |
| Resolución del escáner | QHD Wide 1440p |
| Tecnología de pantalla | LED |
| Resolución de pantalla máxima | 2560x1440 |
Acerca de este producto
- Haz clic aquí para comprobar si este producto es compatible con tu modelo
- Pantalla de 23.8 pulgadas con formato 16:9 y resolución 2560 x 1440
- Relación de contraste (típica): 1000:1, tiempo de respuesta 1 ms
- Brillo de pantalla: 350 cd/m², densidad de pixeles 123 ppp
- Conectividad USB 3.0 (3.1 Gen 1), HDMI, DisplayPort
Hay un nuevo modelo de este producto:
![]() |
Productos destacados que te pueden gustar
Los clientes que vieron este producto también vieron
Información de producto
Detalles técnicos
Información adicional
| ASIN | B01KZIOSSQ |
|---|---|
| Valoración media de los clientes |
4,2 de 5 estrellas |
| Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon | nº25,831 en Informática (Ver el Top 100 en Informática) nº1,469 en Monitores |
| Producto en Amazon.es desde | 25 agosto 2016 |
Ayúdanos a mejorar
Contenido de la caja
Más información del producto
Dell 24: S2417DG Monitor para juegos
Experiencia de juego como nunca antes con tecnología profesional NVIDIA G-Sync y nuestra frecuencia de actualización más rápida disponible.
Póngase cómodo, juegue durante más tiempo
Las sesiones de juego durante toda la noche pueden ser estresantes, pero con estos diseños prácticos y cuidados, puede ponerse cómodo y jugar con su verdadero potencial.
Conmutación de práctica
Cambiar entre los sistemas es más fácil que nunca. La amplia gama de puertos de conectividad le permite cambiar de juegos de PC a su consola secundaria de juegos sin necesidad de volver a organizar los cables.
Justo lo que más le gusta
Incline, pivote, rote y ajuste su monitor a la posición justa para una experiencia de juego ergonómica, cómoda y mejorada.
- Una pantalla sin parpadeos que optimiza la comodidad de la vista para que pueda seguir jugando y dominando
- Sumérjase como antes: introduzca una dimensión de realismo en juegos en 3D con las gafas 3D opcionales de NVIDIA
La perfección panorámica
La carcasa ultracompacta le permite disfrutar de una configuración sencilla de dos o varios monitores para su puesto de batalla. Y con la capacidad de personalizar la configuración o profundizar en 3D, obtendrá una experiencia de juego excepcional y a su medida.
Rendimiento alto, experiencia de juego superior
Juegue como los profesionales con imágenes de alto rendimiento.
Tarjetas gráficas sin distorsiones: independientemente de la rapidez a la que se mueva, podrá disfrutar de una experiencia de juego con claridad nítida gracias a la rápida frecuencia de actualización (165 Hz) y a NVIDIA G-Sync. Sin seccionar la pantalla: sin intermitencia y sin imágenes Ghost significa que no hay nada que interfiera en el rendimiento.
Capacidad de respuesta y precisión: no hay lugar para el lag en la lucha contra un jefe. Experiencia de juego rápida y en tiempo real con un tiempo de respuesta rápido de 1 ms.
Duplique los píxeles. Mejore su experiencia. Imágenes con gran nivel de detalle y una claridad sorprendente con resolución QHD (2560 x 1440). 3,68 millones de píxeles excepcionales: casi dos veces más que el Full HD, para ver el juego como pretendían los desarrolladores.
Opiniones de clientes
Revisado en España el 15 de marzo de 2018
Principales reseñas de España
Ha surgido un problema al filtrar las opiniones justo en este momento. Vuelva a intentarlo en otro momento.
OJO: cuando pruebes el 1440p, los 144Hz y el G-Sync, no querrás nada peor.
Ahora vienen las pegas: Es un monitor TN y adolece de sus defectos: en primer lugar hay que calibrarlo porque de fábrica venía con un gamma muy alto. Cuando se calibra dicho gamma, resulta que aparece "banding" que son saltos en las tonalidades de grises y colores en algunos momentos. Esto se supone que no ocurriría con un monitor IPS, pero también son más caros y tampoco no están exentos de fallos. A pesar de ello, para mi gusto los colores se ven "vivos" para nada apagados como se le suele criticar a los TN.
Otra pega, aunque comprensible, es que los 1440p y 144Hz para exprimirlos requieren una tarjeta gráfica muy potente y cara. Una GTX 1080 Ti o una futura GTX 1180 sería lo ideal, aunque gracias a G-Sync se pueda jugar por debajo de 60 fps de manera fluida y sin "tearing".
En definitiva un monitor muy bueno, pero si eres exigente no es el monitor definitivo, y probablemente quieras un IPS gastando más dinero, o te compres el S2417DG como monitor "de transición" hasta que saquen monitores 4K 144Hz IPS HDR G-Sync, a un precio razonable, algo así como un "dream team" de características técnicas para cualquier "gamer", que hoy por hoy no existe (si quieres un AUS PG27UQ prepara la cartera, porque han salido en EE.UU. por $2000)
Pensaba que me iba a arrepentir de pagar tanto por un monitor solo para evitar el screen tearing, pero he probado a desactivar GSYNC en juegos como The Witcher 3, Battlefield 1 y Rainbow Six y la diferencia es como la noche y el dia. Si quieres evitar usar Vsync, que limita los fps para evitar screen tearing añadiendo un input lag bastante notorio, necesitas GSYNC (si tienes tarjeta Nvidia).
Recomiendo emparejarlo con una GTX 1080 como minimo, para una GTX 1070 recomendaria un monitor 1080 con GSYNC. En juegos muy exigentes como The Witcher 3 estoy sacando una media de 75 fps a 1440p, asique para aprovechar al maximo el monitor con framerrates superiores a 60 hay que invertir en una buena tarjeta grafica.
Tamaño de imagen visible diagonal:
60,47 cm
(23,8")
Área de pantalla predeterminada (H x V):
526,85 mm x 296,35 mm
20,74" x 11,67"
1561,32 cm2 (242,04 pulgadas2 )
Relación de aspecto:
(16:9)
Tecnología de retroiluminación:
LED
Revestimiento de la pantalla:
Antirreflectante con revestimiento duro de 3H
Tipo de pantalla:
TN
Resolución predeterminada máxima:
2560 x 1440 a 165 Hz (con sobreaceleración)
Carcasa estrecha (borde de Monitor a borde de pantalla visible)
7,35 mm
Ángulo de visión:
160° (vertical) típico
170° (horizontal) típico
Relación de contraste:
1000:1 (típica)
Separación entre píxeles:
0,2058 mm x 0,2058 mm
Píxeles por pulgada (ppp):
123
Brillo:
350 cd/m2 (típico)
Tiempo de respuesta:
1 ms
Gama de colores:
82 % (CIE1976)/72 % (CIE1931)
Profundidad de color:
16,7 millones de colores
Las conexiones que tiene son:
1 DP (versión 1.2)
1 HDMI (versión 1.4)
1 puerto USB 3.0 de subida
2 puertos USB 3.0: parte lateral
2 puertos USB 3.0: parte inferior
1 conector de salida de línea de audio: parte inferior
G-SYNC compatible
Sin parpadeos
Recomendado 100% para juegos que es mi caso.
Reseñas más importantes de otros países
Sadly, there's no real alternative to the XB271HU as Asus and Viewsonic's offerings use panels from the same factory, leaving them prone to all the same failings and shortcomings.
The New Kid
So instead, I decided to go for a different kind of monitor: The Dell S2417DG, a 24" 1440p/165Hz, G-Sync-enabled TN screen. How would the pixel density of 1440p hold up in a 24" form factor? What about the drawbacks of using TN over IPS?
Well, after a few hours with it I'm quite happy with the screen, both as an alternative to the XB127HU (with some caveats), and as a replacement for my AOC G2460PG (24", 1080p/144Hz, G-Sync-enabled TN panel).
Cabling
The Acer came with a low quality DisplayPort cable that offered only enough slack to connect it to the graphics card... And that's fine... until you start using the ergonomic powers of your VESA arm and find the cable (with its catching latch) has torn itself apart, partly lodging in the monitor.
The Dell comes with a longer cable that has enough slack for ergonomic adjustments (though I'd like a bit more cable still), it has no catching mechanism to hold it in place, either (which is good or bad depending on how you look at it).
Oddly, the Dell cable has been folded upon itself multiple times (every 5 inches or so across its length), which might be responsible for it lacking the stiffness and inflexibility common to most DisplayPort cables.
Coating
The Acer featured a glossy-matte coating designed to enhance image clarity and bring vivid colours to the fore. But in certain situations it could be intrusive, giving deep blacks a sort of glittery appearance (a bit like how some colours have a weird holographic glow when using 3D on the 3DS), or giving white screens a wiped-a-wet-towel-on-the-screen look when viewed at off-angles/close (essentially negating the viewing angle benefits of going IPS in the first place).
The Dell has none of these shortcomings. However, it does feature a fine grain apparent at close range on white screens. That said, if you do happen to be sitting close you'll likely find the effect less distracting than whatever is happening on the Acer as it' clear it's part of the screen, and not something itching to be wiped off.
Menu Navigation
This one's a tie. The Dell has an easier to navigate UI because the function of the buttons isn't as context dependent/prone to change depending on which layer of which menu you're on, making for a consistent and relatively intuitive experience.
However, it must be said that the buttons are stiff and require more force than they really should. On a plus note the Dell powers on instantly, with no wind-up time before showing an image or intrusive branding/logo splash screen (which, TBH, most monitors are guilty of, not just the Acer).
Image Quality: Static
At first blush the Acer is the clear winner when it comes to image quality. The combination of the 1440p resolution and superb contrast afforded by its IPS screen deliver a one-two punch that left me gobsmacked at the sheer pop of games like Rayman Origins and Trails of Cold Steel. Further, the dark scene performance in Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition's catacombs were on the mark, being sufficiently dingy, without banding into an incomprehensible mess. I could play horror games on the Acer without trouble.
The Dell, by contrast, err... lacks contrast. Even after calibration (which is a necessity for the Dell). Don't get me wrong, it looks GREAT in scenes with lots of popping colours, and it handles dark scenes with all the gradient and nuance the Acer does (arguably better without the intrusive coating the Acer sports)... but it didn't blow my socks off the way the Acer did.
This is despite the fact that the Dell sports a higher pixel density than the Acer (which should give it the clear lead in image clarity)... only it doesn't: the excellent colours and contrast of the Acer, with its rich colours and inky blacks actually contribute more to a bold, defined image than the pixel density; the bulk of the improvements to image I saw going from the AOC 1080p TN panel to the Acer's 1440p IPS panel were down to colour performance, not resolution difference.
But the story begins to shift once we start looking more discerningly at moving images: Enter games.
Image Quality: Motion
A TN panel should be expected to beat an IPS panel in motion clarity as they sport faster pixel response times. It's often said, however, that only a pro-gamer with a trained eye would notice the difference between the 1ms of a TN and the 4ms of an IPS, and then only at the fastest of framerates.
Well, I must have the eyes of a hawk then (despite the glasses) because running through the opening stage of Sonic: Lost World on the Acer's IPS display immediately threw up issues for me (and Lost World is capped at 60fps).
When Sonic was ping-ponging and criss-crossing laterally across the screen past spires of greenery there was something "off" about the IPS. It just wasn't possible for my eyes to track the motion of the scenery flying by with the clarity I was accustomed to on my AOC G2460PG. On some, almost unconscious level, the motion eluded focus.
On the Dell I cleared the stage and what jumped out to me was... absolutely nothing. There was no unconscious hiccups at all, as one would expect of a gaming-oriented TN panel.
However, the Dell goes further by besting the AOC's motion processing: when playing Sonic Mania I found I could track the lateral movement of a full-speed Sonic hurtling across the screen and through corkscrews with more ready ease than I've been able to on any display.
It's not quite at the point where I can focus directly on Sonic and the scenery flying by his shoulders without getting queasy (but then no display can), but the motion stands up to scrutiny far better than any other display I've used, and in practice (when you aren't staring at one point on the screen) translates to a more comfortable viewing experience overall.
The appreciable input lag of a monitor is another area where IPS has seen great gains over the years. And as if to bear that out the Acer felt no different to play on to me than the AOC TN screen.
However, the Dell once again delivered a subtle, but borderline perceptible increase in snappiness when jumping from orb to orb in Sonic Mania's climactic zone. Keep in mind this is a difference perceivable to an amateur, on a 60fps game, played with a controller, that's wireless. I'd imagine the difference is more pronounced in a pro-gaming scenario.
Usability
In order for the Acer to maintain the appropriate warmth to display white-whites whilst maintaining colour accuracy it has to be set exceptionally bright. This has the effect of being eye-searing, making bright games in a darkened room impossible, and MS Word induce borderline instantaneous blindness even used in a lit room. Conversely, reducing the brightness to acceptable levels robbed the display of its trademark visual punch.
So while the Acer might have won the static image quality award for its bold colours, in real life usability tests it actually delivers a less punchy image that's relatively closer to the Dell (once your retinal safety has been accounted for). In essence the Acer's colour advantage is significantly pared back unless you know you are going to be using it in a brightly lit room, studio, or tanning salon.
The Dell stood up to my darkened room test satisfactorily. I found the prescribed brightness setting of 58/100 to work in both darkened rooms and well lit rooms alike for most content (though white screens where uncomfortable in the dark).
Incidentally, the lower brightness meant less extreme backlight bleed on the Dell (limited to the bottom corners) than the Acer. Not that the Acer I used had bad backlight bleed, it's just that the effect of the bleed came across in a yellowish hue (though normally only appreciable on wholly black screens) whereas on the Dell it's more of a deep purple that gels better with the black on the rest of the screen.
So while the Acer does indeed have the deeper blacks, on all black screens the Dell actually gives the impression of greater uniformity, even if its black is a tad warmer.
Aside: Viewing Experience
At some point pixel density and viewing distance are both high enough that a screen effectively becomes a 'retina display', where the individual pixels are indiscernible, making resolution increases largely a lost cause.
As someone who sits around 40" from my screens I found that the 27" Acer looked considerably cleaner/crisper when going from 1080p to 1440p. Not so on the Dell where the screen size and PPI colluded to keep the resolution jump from being much of a jump at all. Combined with the gut-punch the contrast of the Acer provided the Dell certainly felt like a smaller upgrade than the Acer did over my AOC TN.
But there's two sides to this coin: the Dell handles 1080p content with less appreciable loss of quality because of this. This might also be in part down to the internal display scaler producing a result that looks pretty much the same as the 1080p AOC of the same size.
If I had to choose which of these two monitors to hook a console up to it would be the Dell. That said, I've yet to try it out (and I wonder if the input lag gains and motion processing quality will carry over to console gaming over the HDMI port).
Image Crispness
The short answer is between the (exemplary) quality of the scaler and the density of the pixels the image quality on its 24" display is a clear (albeit small) upgrade over the 27" native 1080p screen I normally use for console gaming. If it were compared against a1080p 24" panel it might end up looking a mite softer, but in my apples to oranges comparison I found the image to be clear and text crisp.The colour tones and contrast in games like Persona 5 were spot on, both in-game and during the anime cutscenes.
Pre-rendered Video Performance
However, it should be noted that Persona 5's pre-rendered anime sections are of high quality, not all games use such high quality cutscenes, leading to less flattering results: macroblocking and other artefacts are visible under scrutiny in cases of zealous compression (The Nathan Drake Collection's cutscenes outed themselves as pre-rendered, whereas on other screens I've been unable to discern them from gameplay).
Distant Detail Resolution
One thing that did surprise me is I can now tell in games when something in the distance is blurry because of LOD quality, simply being too far away from the camera to resolve, or masked by a DOF filter. This was something I found I couldn't tell as well with my 27" monitor with things in the distance just being muddy/not worth concentrating on.
So far, my fears of using it to play console games seem to have been baseless (though I have yet to see how it will handle the 720p content of many Wii U games).
On-Board Audio
The other thing I got to try out was the headphone port on the left-side of the monitor (which is tastefully blacked out). The volume ceiling on it is rather low (though adequate in my testing with Yakuza Kiwami) but there was no distortion, hissing or any other audio artefacting. but it simply doesn't deliver the same range of ambient sound that the DualShock 4's included headphone port does (the chatter of NPCs around Kamurucho were immediately more pronounced on the DS4).
I'd consider the included headphone port merely functional, yet perfectly adequate for podcasts and the like. However I wouldn't attempt to watch movies or play games through it as the chances are your connected device will feature better sound quality on its headphone ports. If Dell revise/update the monitor they could include some better DAC circuitry to improve the sound.
Packaging
Lastly, let's talk about packaging. Why? Because if you ever have to RMA a monitor it will be the last thing you will appreciate/hate. It's nice to have packaging that doesn't require a factory robot to cram everything back in between crumbling bits of polystyrene.
The Acer was a complete nightmare in this regard (which is funny given the poor QC with those screens), but the Dell packaging is neatly laid out, doesn't include an excess of pointless wrapping, and hasn't been put together seemingly in a zero gravity vacuum: You'll have no trouble extracting the monitor, nor getting it back factory packed should you ever need to.
That awkward dance of wiggling tightly sandwiched electronics out of an upturned box gives way here to a couple of latches that let you simply lift away the top cover as if you were accessing a toolbox, and not highly secured nuke.
There's no massive chunks of breakable polystyrene here, just good old snugly packed cardboard cartons, cushioned by solid cardboard pockets built into the box itself for the express purpose of taking shocks. More manufacturers should build shock resistance into their boxes, rather than stuffing them impossibly full of flaky packaging.
The pixel density of this monitor is unmatched at anything below 4k (and mobile smart phones which often have high ppi thanks to their small size). The specs speak for themselves: G-Sync, 1440p, 144hz, HDMI/DP, razor thin borderless bezel, amazing colors for a TN when you calibrate it and so far seems extremely reliable. One thing I want to emphasise is don't be put off by the price. I bought mine for £430 New on Amazon which is amazing value for money and a good investment considering I intend to have this monitor for at the very least a few years. For the monitor market and bearing in mind the top specs for this monitor, this price is extemely competitive. Unlike other (cheaper and more expensive!) monitors, this Dell has no trade-offs in terms of build quality or specs to reduce the costs (eg. 144hz but 1080p or 1440p but 60hz).
Imho, for gaming you won't find any monitor better than this at any price point.
The colour seems a bit "off" (I can't think of a better word!?) when on the desktop and browsing the web, and banding with gradients is quite disappointing. Another issue I encountered was that if I have the power saver mode switched on, I can't wake the monitor using the keyboard and I couldn't find a fix other than turning power saver mode off.
It's main purpose is obviously gaming and it does that with top marks, but for the price I wish the colour/calibration issues weren't there.
Revisado en Reino Unido el 10 de agosto de 2019
I've not found too many issues as of yet, and the ones I have had have been minor;
>You can't seem to turn off the monitor without it disconnecting entirely (as in, if you have multiple monitors, the computer will reconfigure to just use the others) - for watching movies, on another monitor, when you want a blank screen, this is a little annoying. This is a very individual issue though.
>There isn't a 'flipped' version of the screen. If you have multiple monitors, and place them next to each other, then one of the screens USB passthroughs will be useless unless you want to invert the screen (and live with an upside down logo, and differing switch positions).
> The menu system isn't the easiest to use. It took me awhile to figure out why it wasn't switching from HDMI to DisplayPort.
Once everything is set up though, I've not had any issue with the product in the slightest. Great picture quality, great refresh rate, a great improvement over standard monitors, without needing to break the bank (for monitor and general computer cost) to get a 4k rig going. That'll probably be a few years off still, so this is a good stopgap.














