No es necesario ningún dispositivo Kindle. Descárgate una de las apps de Kindle gratuitas para comenzar a leer libros Kindle en tu smartphone, tablet u ordenador.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Obtén la app gratuita:

Precio lista ed. digital: EUR 11,35
Precio Kindle: EUR 7,94

Ahorra EUR 2,74 (26%)

IVA incluido (si corresponde)

Estas promociones se aplicarán a este artículo:

Algunas promociones pueden combinarse; otras no. Para más detalles, revisa los términos y condiciones de cada promoción.

Enviar a mi Kindle o a otro dispositivo

Enviar a mi Kindle o a otro dispositivo

Errornomics: Why We Make Mistakes and What We Can Do To Avoid Them de [Hallinan, Joseph T]
Anuncio de app de Kindle

Errornomics: Why We Make Mistakes and What We Can Do To Avoid Them Versión Kindle


Ver los 6 formatos y ediciones Ocultar otros formatos y ediciones
Precio Amazon
Nuevo desde Usado desde
Versión Kindle
"Vuelva a intentarlo"
EUR 7,94
Tapa dura
"Vuelva a intentarlo"
EUR 32,26 EUR 12,75

Longitud: 309 páginas Word Wise: Activado Tipografía mejorada: Activado
Volteo de página: Activado Idioma: Inglés

Kindle Unlimited
Lee más de 1 millón de eBooks en cualquier dispositivo Kindle o en la aplicación gratuita Kindle. Pruébalo gratis durante 30 días

Descripción del producto

Críticas

"Entertains while it informs. Hallinan brings the science of human behavior to life, showing how it applies to us every day" (Don Norman, author of THE DESIGN OF EVERYDAY THINGS)

"In breezy chapters, Hallinan examines 13 pitfalls that make us vulnerable to mistakes...packing in an impressive range of intriguing and practical real-world examples. A lesson in humility as much as human behavior, Hallinan's study should help readers understand their limitations and how to work with them" (Publishers Weekly)

"Starred Review* What an eye-opener! If you're someone who has trouble remembering the names of people (or common objects), if you seem to forget things almost immediately after you learn them, if your memory of past events frequently turns out to be drastically at odds with the facts, relax: you're not alone. A vastly informative, and for some readers vastly reassuring, exploration of the way our minds work" (David Pitt Booklist US)

Descripción del producto

How did security staff at LA International Airport miss 75% of bomb-making materials that went through screening? Which way should you turn before joining a supermarket queue? Why should a woman hope it was a man who witnessed her bag being snatched? And what possessed Burt Reynolds to punch a guy with no legs?

Human beings can be stubbornly irrational and wilfully blind ... but at least we're predictably wrong. From minor lapses (why we're so likely to forget passwords) to life-threatening blunders (why anaesthetists used to maim their patients), Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Joseph T. Hallinan explains the everyday mistakes that shape our lives, and what we can do to prevent them happening.

Detalles del producto

  • Formato: Versión Kindle
  • Tamaño del archivo: 886 KB
  • Longitud de impresión: 309
  • Números de página - ISBN de origen: 0767928059
  • Editor: Ebury Digital (26 de enero de 2010)
  • Vendido por: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Idioma: Inglés
  • ASIN: B0031RS2RM
  • Texto a voz: Activado
  • X-Ray:
  • Word Wise: Activado
  • Lector con pantalla: Compatibles
  • Tipografía mejorada: Activado
  • Valoración media de los clientes: Sé el primero en opinar sobre este producto
  • Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon: n.° 262.260 de Pago en Tienda Kindle (Ver el Top 100 de pago en Tienda Kindle)
  • ¿Quieres informarnos sobre un precio más bajo?

Opiniones de clientes

Todavía no hay opiniones de clientes en Amazon.es
5 estrellas
4 estrellas
3 estrellas
2 estrellas
1 estrella

Opiniones de clientes más útiles en Amazon.com (beta) (Puede incluir opiniones del Programa de Recompensas de Opiniones Iniciales)

Amazon.com: 4.2 de un máximo de 5 estrellas 119 opiniones
3 de 3 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas “A MAN’S GOT TO KNOW HIS LIMITATIONS.” – Dirty Harry Callahan 11 de noviembre de 2014
Por Paul Froehlich - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato: Versión Kindle Compra verificada
We make certain mistakes because of the way we are wired. That’s the thesis of Joseph T. Hallinan, who gives a readable summary of research on brains and behavior, along with entertaining anecdotes, to make his point. Studies show human beings have any number of systemic biases that make us prone to certain kinds of errors, in part because we aren’t aware of our biases. Here are a few of them:

• We are powerfully influenced by our first impressions. Consequently, we are reluctant to change answers on tests, even though we would usually get higher scores if we did.

• A related bias is a reluctance to change our minds, even about bad information, and even when we know it is wrong. When people do change their minds, however, they often reconstruct their past opinion to make it consistent with the present one.

• We miss much of what we see because we skim, so we often miss significant things. When we recognize patterns, we tend not to pay close attention to the details. We pay more attention to the beginning of a word than to the end. The more expertise or familiarity we have with something, the more skimming we do. This tendency can have dire consequences when the skimmer is a radiologist looking at an x-ray or a baggage screener looking for a gun.

• We are influenced by the first number we see. Grocery stores know this when they advertise a product 4 for $2 instead of 1 for 50 cents. The number 4 acts as an anchor, resulting in an average 32 percent increase in sales compared to single-unit pricing. A quantity limit also boosts sales -- the higher the limit, the higher the sales. Being listed first on the ballot results in up to 3 percent more votes. Studies show that making the first offer in a negotiation tends to result in a better outcome for the party who makes it.

• People usually feel more responsible for their actions rather than inactions, so we would rather err by failing to act. Doing nothing is less regrettable. Ergo, students have greater regret about making a mistake by changing a right answer to a wrong one than they do about failing to change a wrong answer. By the same token, a consistent pattern in decision making is to take risks in situations where we expect a loss, but to get conservative when it comes to gains, where we want to hold on to a sure thing. A study of NFL teams facing fourth downs concluded that 40 percent of the time, teams would do better by taking the risk of going for it; coaches actually go for it only 13 percent of the time, preferring the safe thing and kicking.

• We think we can multitask better than we actually can. Our brains slow down when it has several tasks, and we are more likely to forget. One example of the risk of multitasking is the traffic hazard caused by talking on the cell phone while driving. “Inattention blindness” is when multitasking drivers look directly at something but do not see it. Cars rigged with cameras show that nearly eight of ten crashes are due to driver distraction, though only one in four drivers admits to those distractions. BTW, older drivers 60 and up can take twice as long to recover from distractions as younger ones.

• We like to believe we are impartial, when the reality is we have strong tendencies shaping our judgments. When people are asked about judgmental biases, they claim they are less biased than average. Most doctors, for example, believe they are not influenced by gifts from drug companies, though they don’t think the same about their colleagues. When recalling our own actions, we tend to put them in a more favorable light than a neutral observer would. This self-serving tendency is so ingrained, writes Hallinan, that we aren’t aware of it. College students recall getting higher grades in high school than they actually did, and showed a far better memory for good grades than bad. Almost none underestimated their grades.

* Overconfidence is a leading cause of error, and most of us – men in particular -- tend to be overconfident. Men overestimate their IQ and attractiveness, while women underestimate theirs. Men also forget their mistakes more readily than women. The conceit that we are above average leads to many mistakes. Overconfidence is high when there is little corrective feedback. Weather forecasters have gotten more accurate over the decades since they started giving the probabilities of various weather events. Their predictions are highly accurate in part because they get quick feedback.

Ironically, overconfidence rises along with the difficulty of the task. As we gain more information about a topic, we gain confidence, albeit more information does not necessarily make people better informed. One study found that students learned more from summaries than from reading whole chapters. Another study found that professional horse handicappers were no more accurate with forty pieces of information than with five, though they were 50 percent more confident in their predictions using forty. A PGA study found that golf pros sank only 54.8 percent of their six-foot putts, though the pros thought their success was 80 percent. Experts in various fields believe their predictions are right, though studies show they have less reason for confidence than they think.

Another example of overconfidence is that when putting something together we generally fail to read the directions. People prefer to follow their intuition than reading a manual. That leads to mistakes, even injuries in the case of do-it-yourselfers using nail guns. A further problem is that if we learn to do something a certain way, we are resistant to change, ignoring simpler solutions the next time.

How can we reduce mistakes? If we were aware of our biases, then we would have a better chance of avoiding the mistakes they lead to, which is why this book is useful. Hallinan suggests we can moderate overconfidence by asking “what could go wrong?” There is a power to negative thinking so that pitfalls can be discovered instead of ignored. He also advises we do less multitasking, be less resistant to new ways of doing something, and get more sleep, since sleep-deprived people take more risks. He also recommends we give less credence to vivid anecdotes like diet testimonials; averages are more useful than testimonials. Finally, be happy. “Happy people tend to be more creative and less prone to the errors induced by habit.” ###
1 de 1 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Spotlighting our Mistakes 30 de junio de 2011
Por Geoff Garland - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato: Tapa blanda Compra verificada
Are you watching the World Cup Soccer matches? The USA Team had two goals taken away from them; the consensus is the referee calls were baseless--and wrong. How about the Major League Baseball umpire who ruined a perfect game recently? He admitted afterward that he made the wrong decision; then the league's president upheld the wrong call, denying the pitcher his rightful place in immortality--and possibly affecting his financial future. It was estimated he would lose over two hundred thousand dollars in his lifetime from lost income at baseball signing shows.

But those are games we play. What about the BP oil disaster? The question asked over and over is: How could this gross mistake happen? Wasn't anybody, even the government watchdog agency, modeling a cataclysmic deep-water event? Obviously, no one did.

Joseph T. Hallinan's "Why We Make Mistakes" sheds light on "how we look without seeing, forget things in seconds, and are all pretty sure we are way above average."

Hallinan's book illuminates our mistakes--from anchor decisions to hindsight bias to framing and calibration. Are you pounding big hours at work with less than adequate sleep? Chances are you are making reckless gambles. How about overconfident? Be careful, "overconfidence is a leading cause of human error."

Not reading this fast-moving and engaging book could be one more mistake you make.
3 de 3 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
4.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas The First Step to Good Thinking is To Analyze Bad Thinking. 13 de mayo de 2009
Por Kevin Currie-Knight - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato: Versión Kindle Compra verificada
In order to get better at thinking well, it is helpful (and entertaining) to look at what poor thinking looks like. There are scores of books that survey this landscape and I have read many of them. Joseph Hallinan's "Why We Make Mistakes" is one of the most systemic and enjoyable.

Each chapter expoeses a different common but often unconcious error in thinking that we humans display. The common thread between most of these seems to be that people employ a lot of efficient but often erroneous thinking shortcuts. The first section of the book is devoted to this type of error.

A chapter entitled "We Look But Don't Always See," for instance, surveys how we often go astray by settling for brief glances and hunches when more thoughtful pondering might be better. While this "at a glance" style reasoning may have served our ancestors (where it was better to be a sloppy, but alive, thinker than an accurate, but dead, one), it does not always serve us well. Oftentimes, we reason to the most obvious, but not always correct solution.

Another common theme amongst human errors is that we overestimate ourselves in many ways. We try to multitask on the erroneous belief that we can divide our attention between two or more things (responsible for many auto accidents every year). We buy costly annual gym memberships that often go un- or underused because of overeistimating our future behavior. We fail to see when we are wrong because we overestimate our abilities and do not easily admit that we could be wrong. Etc. Etc.

As a teacher, I found several chapters particularly interesting. "We'd Rather Wing It" talks about (a) our relunctance to read manuals and reflect on a problem before "diving right in," and (b) how there is, on the opposite end, such a thing as information overload - a point of diminishing returns where too much information can cloud our judgment. Also, in a chapter called "We Don't Constrain Ourselves" there is a great discussion about the value of instant and direct feedback on learning (one can only practice when one knows what their mistakes are, and how to identify them).

All in all, I found this to be a very interesting book on a subject that should be relevant to anyone who aims at thinking clearly. As mentioned by the author, one can only get better at something when one is cognizant of one's mistakes and the areas in which to look for them.
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Fantastic intro to human psychology... 1 de agosto de 2014
Por Stephen Swanson - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato: Versión Kindle Compra verificada
I use books like this when I teach Freshman Comp. This works fantastically for readers who are not really interested in reading, as Hallinan captures the imagination with research and applicable examples from life. My one critique would be that the work is clearly targeting Boomers in a management/middle-management sort of variety through Hallinan's choice of examples, references to Nixon, businesses, and golf-type things. Yet, most of the research focuses on college-aged populations, because that it the population for many studies. This isn't "bad", but it does provide up and down in terms of applicability and tone. Still, I wish that every incoming student read this book.
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Read this book for your own good! 17 de diciembre de 2016
Por Old Jim - Publicado en Amazon.com
Formato: Versión Kindle Compra verificada
This book should be required reading for everyone on the planet. This would be expecially true for persons in positions of power and decision making. Much of what is wrong with our planet could be rectified by application of principles discussed in this book. Do yourself a favor, read this book, maybe more than once. Your life will be better for it.
click to open popover