- Tapa dura: 608 páginas
- Editor: University of Chicago Press (29 de septiembre de 2004)
- Idioma: Inglés
- ISBN-10: 0226845486
- ISBN-13: 978-0226845487
- Valoración media de los clientes: Sé el primero en opinar sobre este producto
- Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon: nº1.223.725 en Libros en idiomas extranjeros (Ver el Top 100 en Libros en idiomas extranjeros)
On the Origin of Phyla (Inglés) Tapa dura – 29 sep 2004
Descripción del producto
"A magisterial compendium.... Valentine offers a judicious evaluation of an astonishing array of evidence." - Richard Fortey, New Scientist "Truly a magnum opus, On the Origin of Phyla has already taken its place as one of the classic scientific texts of the twentieth century, affecting the work of paleontologists, morphologists, and developmental, molecular, and evolutionary biologists for decades to come." - Ethology, Ecology & Evolution "Valentine is one of the Renaissance minds of our time.... Darwin wisely called his best-known work On the Origin of Species; the origin of the phyla is an even stickier problem, and Valentine deserves credit for tackling it at such breadth.... A magnificent book." - Stefan Bengtson, Nature"
Reseña del editor
Owing its inspiration and title to "On the Origin of Species", James W. Valentine's ambitious book synthesizes and applies the vast treasury of phyla theory and research collected in the century and a half since Darwin's time. By investigating the origins of life's diversity, Valentine unlocks the mystery of the origin of phyla. One of the twentieth century's most distinguished paleobiologists, Valentine here integrates data from molecular genetics, evolutionary developmental biology, embryology, comparative morphology, and paleontology into an analysis of interest to scholars from any of these fields. He begins by examining the sorts of evidence that can be gleaned from fossils, molecules, and morphology, then reviews and compares the basic morphology and development of animal phyla, emphasizing the important design elements found in the body plans of both living and extinct phyla. Finally, Valentine undertakes the monumental task of developing models to explain the origin and early diversification of animal phyla, as well as their later evolutionary patterns.Ver Descripción del producto
No es necesario ningún dispositivo Kindle. Descárgate una de las apps de Kindle gratuitas para comenzar a leer libros Kindle en tu smartphone, tablet u ordenador.
Obtén la app gratuita:
Detalles del producto
Si eres el vendedor de este producto, ¿te gustaría sugerir ciertos cambios a través del servicio de atención al vendedor?
Opiniones de clientes
|5 estrellas (0%)|
|4 estrellas (0%)|
|3 estrellas (0%)|
|2 estrellas (0%)|
|1 estrella (0%)|
Opiniones de clientes más útiles en Amazon.com
The title, admittedly, is off-putting. It’s a Rorschach test, in a sense; how many would-be book buyers would immediately see, in the title, a paraphrase of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species? But that is expressly the author’s intent – namely, to write a book that rivals, or at least speaks to, Darwin’s claims in On the Origin of Species (1859). The author sets himself quite a hurdle to overcome, given that Darwin’s book is rightly regarded as among the finest scientific works ever written – if not the finest. If you haven’t read it, you should.
But Darwin was well aware of his magnificent book’s limitations. So far as Darwin knew, species originated by means of “descent with modification,” brought about by natural selection. Speciation, in Darwin’s framework, takes time – lots of time. Darwin was well aware that most of the extant animal phyla appeared quite suddenly, at the base of the Cambrian. In a chapter devoted to the subject, Darwin argued that there must have been a very long period, prior to the Cambrian and as yet undiscovered, in which the predecessors of these phyla evolved. If the phyla indeed emerged out of the blue, as the fossil evidence suggests, Darwin – in his honesty -- conceded that this evidence posed a formidable challenge to his theory. Unless future research could demonstrate a very lengthy evolutionary prelude to the Cambrian Explosion, Darwin conceded, there would be good grounds for doubting his theory.
The trouble is, there is still no incontrovertible evidence of animal evolution prior to the dawn of the Cambrian. Darwin would have taken solace in “molecular clock” studies, which trace beginnings of animal differentiation to the Cryogenian, deep with the Neoproterozoic (about 750 to 800 ma). Still, there is no generally accepted fossil evidence to support these studies. Beginning about 560 ma, to be sure, there is evidence aplenty of puzzling life forms that appear to be animal-like (the Ediacaran or Vendian fauna), but the jury is still out on their affinities to today’s animal world. But there is plenty of evidence of increasing oxygenation of the world’s oceans at the Cambrian’s dawn, followed shortly by the appearance of the first undoubted animal fossils. Within the short span of another twenty to forty million years – a mere heartbeat in geological time – there is abundant fossil evidence of animals that had already developed the thirty-odd body plans evident in today’s extant phyla. Given the short span in which this astounding development took place, it is clear that Darwin’s question – how do species originate? – falls short of the mark. We need to ask, how do phyla originate? And that is precisely the point of this book.
What is a phylum, exactly? Valentine tackles this murky point at the onset, pointing out that nobody knows, really. Defined ecumenically, a phylum describes a group of animals that share a distinctive body plan – a blueprint, of sorts, for organizing an organism in order to successfully grow, eat, fend off predators, and reproduce (if not necessarily in that order). Beginning with Linnaeus’ effort to impose order on the world of living creatures by means of hierarchical categories, phyla have been created to sum up biologists’ views, in the end, of distinctiveness and relatedness. A worm found in the ocean might be distinct in its color and structure, but further investigation – including a study of its ontogeny, or means of development – might reveal a connection – presumably, an ancestral connection -- to other, seemingly dissimilar beings. Underlying the Echinodermata, for example, is a rather sweeping commitment to pentaradial symmetry, often achieved only at the cost of a wrenching transformation as larvae become adults. But the number, always, is five. Contrast this with the ctenaphora, who move their iridescent bodies through the waters of the sea by means of rows of beating cilia. The number of rows, always, is eight… or, as fossils ctenophores suggest, some multiple of eight. Just how many phyla exist is, to this day, a matter of controversy, but the consensus number is in the mid-thirties. Why did they all appear so suddenly – and why have so few appeared since? What is more, does their very existence attest to the operation of evolutionary processes on the level not merely of species, as Darwinian evolutionists insist, but more broadly, on the much deeper and more broadly shared body plans that manifest themselves into today's extant phyla?
The pages of On the Origin of Phyla walk the reader through the best of today’s knowledge concerning the vexing questions raised by the evolution of animals, beginning with a convincing argument that the origin of phyla is indeed a problem worth explaining. The second section of the book examines each of the extant phyla in detail, explaining their body plans and critically examining the various strands of evidence, molecular and fossil, for their relatedness and differentiation. The third section of the book capably addresses the competing (and conflicting) perspectives offered to explain the seemingly sudden origin of phyla. In the end, this book does not provide definitive answers to the questions it poses, for no such answer can be given as yet. But nowhere else will the interested reader find a more objective, trustworthy guide.
The book starts off by covering a lot of background biology. The first chapter covers very basic topics relating to classifying animals such as: what phyla are, why it's useful to study homologues, the nature of hierarchies and cladistics.
The second chapter covers cellular biology. This quickly moves from the study of single cells to how cells aggregate to form tissues, organs and other body parts. This sets the stage for the following chapters that discuss body plans and how their development is determined by a system of regulatory genes, not just individual alleles.
Following this is a discussion of the fossil record, a high level view of the phyla and how they are related to each other. Much of the rest of the book is spent elaborating on this material.
The first section concludes with a discussion of the Cambrian Explosion. The main ideas he describes are: there was no explosion, it was due to physical changes in the environment, it was due to a biological changes in the environment or it was due to an intrinsic evolutionary change. Needles to say it's an open question and the author couldn't give a definitive answer. As more material is covered the question is addressed several times later in the book.
This first part of the book alone made it worth it to me.
The next six chapters form the heart of the book, they give a very detailed account of the phyla. More than just a catalog, it presents how the phyla are related to each other and how they are broken up into subphyla and classes. The evidence from the fossil record is continually presented and details of the body plans of the phyla are illustrated with specific examples. The level of detail is fantastic.
Give the title there probably isn't much of a chance that someone would pick this book up for a casual read. It's even more rigorous and complete than I expected. However, there is a lot of background material (which is quite interesting in its own right) and things are pretty much explained from the ground up. The bits of humor in the book were enjoyable, I especially appreciated the dig at postmodernism on page 78. A non-expert, like me, can benefit from reading this book and enjoy it too, but should be ready for a tough read (for me the most difficult part was the vast amount of terminology, but the glossary helped to offset that). I would expect that people with more expertise will likely enjoy it even more.