EUR 15,25
  • Precio final del producto
Envío GRATIS en pedidos superiores a 19 EUR en ropa, calzado, accesorios, equipaje y libros. Ver detalles.
En stock.
Vendido y enviado por Amazon. Se puede envolver para regalo.
Perfumes. The A-Z Guide se ha añadido a la cesta
¿Tienes uno para vender?
Volver atrás Ir adelante
Escuchar Reproduciendo... Interrumpido   Estás escuchando una muestra de la edición de audio Audible.
Más información
Ver las 2 imágenes

Perfumes. The A-Z Guide (Inglés) Tapa blanda – 22 oct 2009

5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas 1 opinión de cliente

Ver los formatos y ediciones Ocultar otros formatos y ediciones
Precio Amazon
Nuevo desde Usado desde
Versión Kindle
"Vuelva a intentarlo"
Tapa dura
"Vuelva a intentarlo"
EUR 46,60 EUR 18,01
Tapa blanda
"Vuelva a intentarlo"
EUR 15,25
EUR 9,90 EUR 9,12
click to open popover

Comprados juntos habitualmente

  • Perfumes. The A-Z Guide
  • +
  • The Secret of Scent: Adventures in Perfume and the Science of Smell
Precio total: EUR 28,21
Comprar los productos seleccionados conjuntamente

Descripción del producto


As scintillating as it is comprehensive...this pungent, entrancing book is a wake up call for the nostrils. (The Independent 2009-10-30)

An unexpected classic of criticism (Philip Hensher Spectator (Books of the Year))

If you are at all interested in perfume, one of life's greatest sensual pleasures, this is an essential possession (David Sexton Evening Standard)

This husband-and-wife team has produced a work of perfume criticism that is as gripping as any thriller. (Jan Moir Daily Mail)

I loved it and bought it for all my friends. I have to say that this is certainly my favourite non-fiction book ever and is very likely my favourite book of all time! If I had to take only one book with me onto a desert island for an indefinite time, it would be this one. (Joanne Harris - author of 'Chocolat' 2009-10-13)

The perfect gift for the scent addict in your life...witty and informative - and, occasionally, deliciously bitchy. (The Times 2009-10-24)

Brilliant writing... I shall now spray on my favourite scents in quite a different frame of mind! (Joanna Trollope By email 2009-10-29)

hugely engrossing...the writing is brilliant...gorgeous. (Evening Standard 2009-10-29)

Lyrical and acerbically witty compendium. (The Times 2009-10-31)

From riotous one-liners to elaborate reviews, fragrance experts Luca Turin and Tania Sanchez have written an authoritative guide to the best and worst scents. (Daily Express 2009-10-30)

It's a great book because it brilliantly combines technical knowledge with evocative, poetic and often laugh-out-loud-funny prose to provide incisive, vivid and honest criticism of all perfumes - from the 'staggeringly bad' to the 'deeply divine'.

If you want to open your mind to the intricacies of scent - and enjoy a brilliant, entertaining read along the way - I can't recommend it enough.

(Elle 2009-10-22)

consistently entertaining...scathingly inventive bitchiness. (Sunday Business Post 2009-10-25)

astonishingly brilliant and witty companion to all things fragrant. (Spectator 2009-11-07)

dazzlingly comprehensive compendium...the writing is the olfactory equivalent of mouthwatering. (Observer 2009-11-15)

genuinely wonderful...the authors's sense of smell is amazing. (Daily Telegraph 2009-11-14)

I was fascinated... a description of every perfume known to man, which sounds peculiar, but is mesmeric. (William Leith Evening Standard (Books of the year) 2009-11-19)

a staggeringly complete compilation of perfume reviews...ridiculously entertaining. (Daily Mail 2009-11-20)

For any fragrance indispensable beauty bible. (Norwich Evening News 2009-11-10)

Highly entertaining critique which had me both fascinated and laughing out loud in equal measure... addictive and informative. (Phyl Clarke Irish Times 2009-11-28)

It's scents-sational! (Rochelle Warner 2009-12-10)

A wise investment and an addictive read. (Gillian Nelis Sunday Business Post 2009-11-29)

The authors' evocative and vivid writing style convinces us that perfume isn't a science but an art. Never again will you be able to walk past a perfume counter with quite the same nonchalance... if you have a nose for a good book, buy this one. (Anita Sethi Independent on Sunday 2009-12-13)

They're funny, bizarre, weird, hilarious writers. (Alex Heminsley BBC Radio 2 2009-12-11)

It's an eau-de-must-have. If it came in a bottle we'd wear it. (The City Weekly Magazine (Australia) 2010-06-17)

As riveting as a novel and as therapeutic as a recipe book. (Jan Masters Reader's Digest 2010-11-01)

Reseña del editor

Luca Turin and Tania Sánchez are experts in the world of scent.

Ver Descripción del producto

No es necesario ningún dispositivo Kindle. Descárgate una de las apps de Kindle gratuitas para comenzar a leer libros Kindle en tu smartphone, tablet u ordenador.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Obtén la app gratuita:

Detalles del producto

Opiniones de clientes

5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas
5 estrellas
4 estrellas
3 estrellas
2 estrellas
1 estrella
Ver opinión de cliente
Comparte tu opinión con otros clientes

Principales opiniones de clientes

Formato: Tapa blanda Compra verificada
Luca Turin es uno de ellos. Sus opiniones nunca son anodinas. En este libro revisa los principales perfumes del mercado y los juzga con ingenio, con inteligencia y sin piedad. Para cualquiera, una lectura entretenida. Para los interesados en el tema, imprescindible.
Comentario A una persona le ha parecido esto útil. ¿Esta opinión te ha parecido útil? No Enviando comentario...
Gracias por tu opinión.
Lo sentimos, no hemos podido registrar tu voto. Vuelva a intentarlo
Informar de un abuso

Opiniones de clientes más útiles en (beta) 4.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas 208 opiniones
339 de 359 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
4.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Worth Buying, But Beware 9 de mayo de 2008
Por spheremusic - Publicado en
Formato: Tapa dura Compra verificada
Turin argues in his earlier book, _The Secret of Scent_, that smell is not so much about memory and biology, as is widely believed, as it is about beauty and imagination. He believes, furthermore, that one of the highest achievements in perfumery is what he terms "abstraction," that is to say, the creation of olfactory accords that, while perhaps alluding to natural smells, are novel and resistant to definition. These aesthetic axioms (which he presumably shares with co-author/wife Tania Sanchez) are the basis of the evaluations in this book, and we, as readers, have no choice but to take them or leave them. These axioms lead the authors to prefer complex fragrances over simple ones, fragrances that develop over time to linear ones, original and/or unique fragrances over skillful executions of old ideas, "interesting" (even if vaguely unpleasant) fragrances over boring (even if pleasant) ones, etc. In a nutshell, they apply the same standards to perfume that other critics usually apply to other arts. They want perfumery to be taken seriously as an art form, and say as much.

This is a legitimate view, and one to which I am highly sympathetic. That said, I think the authors overlook (or deliberately ignore) some of the factors that render the purely aesthetic appreciation of perfume difficult at best. First of all, perfumes are made to be worn. The final aesthetic effect of a fragrance is inseparable from the time, place, and person(s) involved. Of course this "framing" or contextualization effect is at work in all art forms, but it is arguably more important for perfumery than for others. Given the fact that perfumes are mixtures of chemicals, factors such as temperature, humidity, skin pH, decomposition, underlying body odor, age-related hyposmia, differing olfactory thresholds, etc., make this state-dependence even more crucial. And, regardless of what Turin might say, it is simply impossible to separate a fragrance from the associations (read: memories) it may evoke. Perhaps it's possible to "see" the Platonic form of a perfume behind all of these contingencies, but I highly doubt it. Our reactions to smells are visceral before they're intellectual or aesthetic, no doubt because our sense of smell is our primary sentinel against many toxins and pathogens. Individual differences in sensitivity to certain aromatic chemicals are highly significant and render any kind of objective discussion of fragrances impossible. We're not even working with the same equipment--it's like a society of people who are all partially blind to different colors trying to discuss color coordination. The fundamental variability of our olfactory apparatus, even before differences in taste are taken into account, makes the arrogance of some of the pronouncements in this book a bit galling.

People *wear* fragrances (as opposed to sniffing them on strips--decidedly a minority pastime) for a variety of reasons: to make a statement, to find comfort or stimulation, to complement a particular ensemble, to seduce (and here the tastes of the quarry count far more than Apollonian meditations on beauty), and even, in some parts of the world, to mask the fact that they haven't bathed (it's no wonder that perfumery reached its pinnacle in Europe, where people didn't--and sometimes still don't--bathe regularly). Most people simply want a fragrance to make the day a little more pleasant for themselves and for those around them, not because they want to wear a work of "art" whose complexity and depth are going to make heads turn or spark a discussion about the relative merits of gourmand chypres and aromatic fougeres. Hence the incomprehension and hurt feelings that have greeted some of the harsher reviews in this book.

Assuming that one buys into the premise that perfume is a pure art, the authors, in general, seem to have excellent (i.e., informed, refined, and considered) taste--except when it comes to reviewing the work of their friends. Turin, for example, rates Calice Becker's Beyond Paradise Men as one of the top ten masculines currently in production. Since it isn't very expensive I decided to take a chance and buy it blind on his recommendation. The highly synthetic headache-in-a-bottle I got stuck with isn't terrible, I suppose, but if it's one of the top ten masculines that money can buy in early 2008, then I'm Jacques Guerlain. In a different part of the book I discovered that Turin is good friends with Becker. Ah ha... I don't mean to suggest that Turin was cynically shilling for a friend, but rare is the man who is immune to the tender, insidious persuasions of friendship. I'm certain no one else on the planet would rate that fragrance quite so highly. Such are the dangers inherent in taking the word of a consummate industry insider without a huge grain of salt. Turin also awards points for historical importance to fragrances he can't even stand to be around--Opium, for example. This, I think, is taking the "perfume as art" shtick a little too far. When reviewing fragrances that knock their socks off (especially a fragrance saturated with some deep personal significance) both authors (but Sanchez in particular) tend to wax poetic and come off the rails in terms of actually describing the fragrance. Some of this lyricism is quite affecting, but alas too much of it sounds like an exercise for a creative writing workshop, and the straining for effect turns tiresome. The humor, too, is witty in spots but tends consistently towards juvenile mockery and inane plays on perfumes' names.

All of these caveats aside, this is a very informative and often entertaining book. If you love fragrances, it is clearly a must-buy because it offers an excellent idea of which to sample next. If it educates consumers to stop buying and chides producers to stop making the cheap and and often hideous potions flooding the market, it will have done its job. I've learned a lot from the book and am grateful to the authors for having written it, but in the end it's more trustworthy as a Baedeker than as a Michelin.
94 de 96 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
1.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Kindle Version Outdated 15 de abril de 2012
Por rob brown - Publicado en
Formato: Versión Kindle Compra verificada
The only way to get the newer, updated edition of this book is to buy the paperbook edition.

The Kindle edition is actually taken from the older, outdated hardback edition; which is to say it does not contain the numerous updates, new reviews(~450) and new Top 10 lists.
120 de 133 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
4.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas The Hunter S. Thompson Field Guide To Perfumes 15 de abril de 2008
Por Cologniac - Publicado en
Formato: Tapa dura Compra verificada
I bought this on a whim and am *very* glad I did. This book is both extraordinarily educational and deliciously funny. Along with some nice, straightforward teachings by obvious experts, the book is filled with hugely entertaining mini-reviews of fragrances. The classics are hailed but dissected for the benefit of the class. The mediocre are called on the carpet and judged for both their virtues and their sins. And the trivial and forgettable are dispatched with short but laser-like descriptions of their one failed mission. Prepare to see your guilty pleasures nailed to the cross, and your true loves frisked rudely for shoplifted items. But trust me - it's not like a single Joan Rivers gag photocopied over and over - there's tremendous variety in the reviews. Many recommend superior but lesser-known fragrances that "did it better" - extremely useful to newbies. A lot of history is woven into the reviews - right where you need it. In fact, the education factor is at least two stars of my review. There's even a too-short glossary for people who might be put off by "aldehyde", "fougère", or "woody-amber". I would have loved to have seen more.

I enjoyed the fact that fragrance classifications were toyed with - and with extreme precision. For every "woody citrus" there's something like "evil tuberose" or "sad shampoo". But the authors don't spare themselves from the microscope, either - and hilariously so. [Spoiler: Tania admits to falling in love with one of my wife's favorites while drunk in the store, only to regret her romantic mistake upon sobering up.]

I would not call the reviews mean, but compared to the faux-art BS of the PR flacks, and the generally courteous and literary treatment by fragrance blogistas, these reviews are short and honest to the point of a football tackle - American style. They demonstrate beautifully that the sense of smell is weighted differently for everybody. I found myself fist-pumping and yelling "hallelujah" in agreement with many reviews, but bewildered by others. In a few cases, the authors didn't even mention my personal "love notes", while trashing off-notes that I didn't even know were there. I think this demonstrates why one needs to view it like a trip to the comedy club. Your particular race, religion, or political party is gonna get some heat. They may even pick on your spouse a bit. But it's OK. If you keep a sense of humor, you'll have a good time.

For me, the thing which ultimately sells the book is the frank, intelligent writing. The authors open up the way the best fragrance journalists do - with 100% honesty, and allowing their points to wander into beautiful and effective analogies and sidebars. You will learn to have an effective opinion of fragrances by observing these two masters at work. These two authors have forgotten more about perfume than I will learn in the remainder of my life. And I now have literally dozens of leads on scents that I'm very likely to really enjoy. Just think how little a $10-20 investment is next to a single good bottle. People should get this for the good steers, even if they can't stand to read harsh reviews of their favorites.
130 de 149 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas not perfect but wonderful 11 de mayo de 2008
Por julesinrose - Publicado en
Formato: Tapa dura Compra verificada
I got an e-mail from Amazon (not that it's personal) to write a review of this book. After looking over the others, I don't really see what I can add, but here's my four cents:

1. It's a bit sad to me that folks are so insecure. So what if Turin and Sachez have a different opinion than you? I have heard people say they were devastated that The Guide doesn't say "their scent" is great. It doesn't say some of my favorites are either, and I could care less.

2. Why is everyone saying it's bitchy? Yes, it's scathing, but it's not bitchy. There's a world of difference. Turin and Sanchez love scent and this comes through. They are having fun, I would imagine. And what do we do when we're having fun? Make jokes. Overstate. No, it's not bitchy, for it's never mean just for the sake of it.

3. These folks are professionals in their field. Dr. Turin designs new scent molecules. It is no wonder that they both go for the unusual and even the unwearable. The vast majority of the mid-scale department store scents smell the same: how would you like it if you had to test these on a regular basis? I'm sure your taste, too, would become more refined and gravitate to more bang than, say, yet another quiet white floral.

4. Folks, have some faith in your own opinions and just enjoy. The bottom line is this: this book is a great deal of fun. If you're looking for a list of ingrediants, google it.
40 de 45 personas piensan que la opinión es útil
5.0 de un máximo de 5 estrellas Use this book As An Interactive Guide to Exploring and Collecting Perfumes 7 de octubre de 2008
Por D. Summerfield - Publicado en
Formato: Tapa dura Compra verificada
I'm older now, and I have a little more disposable income (and a lot more self-confidence), so I have had great fun using this book's witty reviews to guide me in trying and purchasing perfumes. I never had more than one or two bottles of perfume on my vanity table before. Now I have several dozen because this book has made me see perfume in a whole new way.

Yes, the book is a delight to read, but I have found it much more fun to actually use. Interestingly, I discovered just how interactive this book can be because I am a book lover.

I was intrigued by the book's description of a perfume by L'Artisan Parfumeur called Dzing! The authors likened the perfume's scent to a "secondhand bookstore." I purchased a bottle on a whim when I happened across it on a trip to New York. It was only when I was browsing at my favorite used bookstore days later that it struck me. The vanilla overtones in this fabulous scent do indeed evoke the wonderful aroma of old paper. I smelled my wrist, I sniffed the terrific, familiar book-laden air around me, I felt a happy sense of discovery and I was hooked.

Since reading this book, I have stuck it into my tote whenever I plan to be in a major department store. The book's vignettes ignite my curiosity and imagination.

Take, for example, Thierry Mugler's Angel. The authors deem this scent a masterpiece. They tell the reader the history behind the scent -- that it started as a joke which combined the elements of a masculine and a feminine fragrance, but that in making that joke the perfumer came up with a truly new kind of scent. The authors point out that Angel exists in a "high energy state of contradiction. Many perfumes are beautiful or pleasant, but how many are exciting?" Then the authors deliver the zinger, which gives me a mental image for placing the perfume into my own life context. They say that Angel evokes that " woman in a film who seethes "He's so annoying!" and marries him in the end." I got that! I could then smell the contradiction and the attraction in the scent. I purchased a bottle because the scent now "speaks" to me in a way it never could have before I read this book.

Is perfume necessary to my existence? No. When my children were small and we had meager time, money or energy, perfume was simply that handy bottle of Chanel No. 5 my mother had sent me for Christmas which I sprayed on to feel pretty on those infrequent dinner/movie dates with my husband (when we could get a babysitter.) Do I agree with everything the authors say about the various perfumes? No, but that's part of the fun.

This book has opened a pleasant door for me. Perfume has become a fascinating foray into sensual exploration. I enjoy reading the metaphors and similes, the creative adjectives and backstories describing these perfumes, and then experimenting with the truth of them for myself.

The authors have done something wonderful with this book. They have taken the mystique which advertising has always made sure surrounded fragrance and swept it away. But they have replaced that mystique with something better -- little personalities, if you will, for the different scents. Now browsing at the perfume counter has become like attending a cocktail party filled with famous people. Some will speak to you immediately. Some will stand back, but become friendly if you approach. Some are dull as dishwater. Some you will dislike. But being an insider at the party is exciting. I love that I have an invitation.